Home site (really)

[marathoner]

No, I don't think it's anything to do with the WB version since all versions will use the template to control page layout. I don't know what template you started with so I have no idea if that template would validate either. Most of the issues appear to be easy to fix. For example, you are either missing or have your your closing HEAD tag in the wrong place; didn't close BR tags, missing IMG ALT attribute...these are all pretty easy to fix.

[RogerBaker]

Thanks for the info. I will have to see what's up with all those validation issues. I think the only thing I did with the template was change the images and sizes. Could the version of WebsiteBaker be part of it?

[marathoner]

Nice looking site but a couple of things that you might want to address:
1) it doesn't validate:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.941alameda.com%2Findex.php&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
2) Why do you have the footer placed below the 'gray area' which looks like the place designed for the footer?

[RogerBaker]

I used WebsiteBaker to setup a website to showcase my home for sale. I love how easy it is to use. I modified the Blue Swizzy New template. I had a guestbook originally, but i took it down due to my friends filling it with inapporpriate content.

Let me know what you think.

www.941alameda.com