ported simple beauty template

[mopey]

ahh, yes.  Thanks Matthias.

[ruebenwurzel]

Hello,

Or maybe I just can't get it working properly.

You give the answer to your question in the post above yourself.  . It is very simple and directly in front of your eyes, think even to simple that you see it.  .

simply change $aItemOpen parameter wich is default:

Code Select Expand

'[li][a][menu_title]</a>'
to:

Code Select Expand

'[li]<a href="[url]">[menu_title]</a>'

This gives you a link without target

Matthias

[mopey]

I do like show_menu2(), and I'm glad it's being included.  Though show_menu2 also will spit out the target at least by default... I think (at least I couldn't get it to not include the target). 

$aMenuOpen has an attribute
[target]        Page target for the <a> tag

that looks promising.   But both

[a]             <a> tag (no class):         '<a href="[url]" target="[target]">'
[ac]            <a> tag including class:    '<a href="[url]" target="[target]" class="[class]">'

specify a target (which I managed to set 'target=""' but couldn't get rid of the target completely).

Not only that, the target attribute seems to be builtin to the core. eg class.frontend, template.inc, many of the admin pages, etc.  I think it would be more of a pain than it's worth to change (and like you said, a lot of people like the target attribute).  But it isn't valid strict xhtml >= 1.0.  Anyway, maybe the showmenu2 page should specify that it generates valid "transitional xhtml 1.0" rather than "xhtml"?  Or maybe I just can't get it working properly.

[DGEC]

Lot of people like the target, but showmenu is fairly old anyway. A lot of the templates may depend on it.

ShowMenu2 (can) generates valid markup and is going to be included in WB 2.7

[mopey]

ok validates now.  But I still don't get why you WebsiteBaker folks opted for the show_menu function to spit out non-valid strict html.  Not that I care really at all (I'm far from a validation nut).  so I attached an updated template. the only thing changed is the doctype.

[gelöscht durch Administrator]

[mopey]

Here is the default. http://engr.isu.edu/pages/test.php

It doesn't validate, but only because the show_menu function adds a target attribute (not sure why).  Anyway, I'll change the doctype to transitional rather than strict and it shouldn't be an issue.

[ruebenwurzel]

Hello,

and where is the template for testing?

Matthias

[mopey]

So, here's a port of the simple beauty template found at oswd.  I attached the screenshot and the template.  The first screenshot has a custom banner and the second is what you get on a default install.

[gelöscht durch Administrator]